I think it a shame that discussion of evolution usually boils down to a pledge of allegiance either to Darwin or to the handling of snakes. This view admirably distracts attention from the observation that much of Darwinism doesn’t square with observation or even make sense. Religion has nothing to do with it, being an innocent bystander.
I have heard of suspension of disbelief, but I am too weak a cord by which to suspend that much disbelief. What astounds me is that evolutionists believe it without effort.
Nothing is too silly for Darwinian consumption.
The entire Darwinian structure rests on the willingness to accept wild theories without examination.
Essas explicações dos darwinistas, a posteriori, são realmente criativas. Mais engraçado é que aqueles que reclamam da inconsistência lógica ou da inexistência de evidências que comprovem a teoria são os acusados de jogar contra a ciência.
E, para matar de raiva, nem dá para chamar o Fred de fanático religioso.